<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Electric Dirt Farmer &#187; north</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ditto.ca/weblog/tag/north/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ditto.ca/weblog</link>
	<description>A conglomeration of foolishness.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 07:10:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>More Focus on the North</title>
		<link>http://ditto.ca/weblog/2005/08/more-focus-on-the-north/</link>
		<comments>http://ditto.ca/weblog/2005/08/more-focus-on-the-north/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2005 03:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[the proprietor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary Unbound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ditto.ca/weblog/?p=47</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it&#8217;s a good thing that there has been increased attention on the North lately. As is commonly observed: with the warming of the Northern climate there is bound to be more activity up there. So I was glad to read that the CF are sending some ships to Churchill and further. It&#8217;s going [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s a good thing that there has been increased attention on the North lately. As is commonly observed: with the warming of the Northern climate there is bound to be more activity up there. So I was glad to read that the CF are <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&#038;u=/afp/20050818/wl_canada_afp/canadamilitaryarctic_050818214931" title="Yahoo! News (AFP), 18 Aug 2005: Canada beefs up Arctic presence">sending some ships</a> to Churchill and further.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s going to take a good while before the passage becomes really viable and at that point there&#8217;s nothing anyone (especially not the Canadian government) will be able to do to prevent some heavy environment impact. (I think it&#8217;s a relatively sure bet that a ship will at some point spill something nasty while traversing the northwest passage.) However, right now the possibility of an open passage raises the geopolitical question of &#8220;who&#8217;s in charge?.&#8221; And, quite honestly, given the likely candidates and my current knowledge (as always, admittedly limited) I&#8217;d prefer see the answer to remain Ottawa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ditto.ca/weblog/2005/08/more-focus-on-the-north/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
