<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Electric Dirt Farmer &#187; north dakota</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ditto.ca/weblog/tag/north-dakota/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ditto.ca/weblog</link>
	<description>A conglomeration of foolishness.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 07:10:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Compromise on Devil&#8217;s Lake Drainage</title>
		<link>http://ditto.ca/weblog/2005/08/compromise-on-devils-lake-drainage/</link>
		<comments>http://ditto.ca/weblog/2005/08/compromise-on-devils-lake-drainage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2005 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[the proprietor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary Unbound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manitoba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ditto.ca/weblog/?p=45</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I haven&#8217;t seen many details yest, but I&#8217;m happy to see there&#8217;s an agreement on the Devil&#8217;s Lake drainage project. It was obvious that the North Dakota government was going to go ahead with the drainage regardless of what the Manitoba government did. In light of that, a compromise on a filter (and no Missouri [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t seen many details yest, but I&#8217;m happy to see there&#8217;s an <a href="http://www.canada.com/winnipeg/story.html?id=ff68d94c-e0ce-4537-ad95-11255858062a" title="Canada.com (CP): Canada, U.S. reach deal in Devils Lake waterway dispute">agreement on the Devil&#8217;s Lake drainage project</a>. It was obvious that the North Dakota government was going to go ahead with the drainage regardless of what the Manitoba government did. In light of that, a compromise on a filter (and no Missouri water) is clearly as good as it was going to get.</p>
<p>What bothered me about this fight was the escalation of the rhetorical battle without (so it appeared) any formal discussion. I&#8217;ll admit that I don&#8217;t know a lot about the ecological issues but looking at the geography of Devil&#8217;s Lake it seems plausible that the basin contains some unique organisms. And, in any case, I don&#8217;t see the point of having a boundary waters treaty if it&#8217;s not invoked over a dispute like this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ditto.ca/weblog/2005/08/compromise-on-devils-lake-drainage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
