<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Electric Dirt Farmer &#187; grain elevator</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ditto.ca/weblog/tag/grain-elevator/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ditto.ca/weblog</link>
	<description>A conglomeration of foolishness.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 07:10:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>More Elevator Adaption Notes</title>
		<link>http://ditto.ca/weblog/2004/09/more-elevator-adaption-notes/</link>
		<comments>http://ditto.ca/weblog/2004/09/more-elevator-adaption-notes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2004 22:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[the proprietor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary Unbound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grain elevator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manitoba]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ditto.ca/weblog/?p=12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In my earlier post about elevator adapation I link the Inglis Elevators, but I didn&#8217;t link to the Plum Coulee Elevator project. This is a definite oversight: the Plum Coulee project is more interesting because they&#8217;re actually planning to adapt the structure to new functions (as opposed to preserving it). Their website doesn&#8217;t have a [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my earlier post about <a href="/weblog/2004/08/idea-for-grain-elevator-adaptation.html">elevator adapation</a> I link the <a href="http://www.ingliselevators.com/" title="Inglis Grain Elevators National Historic Site">Inglis Elevators</a>, but I didn&#8217;t link to the <a href="http://www.plumcoulee.com/elevator.html">Plum Coulee Elevator</a> project. This is a definite oversight: the Plum Coulee project is more interesting because they&#8217;re actually planning to adapt the structure to new functions (as opposed to preserving it).</p>
<p>Their website doesn&#8217;t have a lot of detail. It does they&#8217;re planning for &#8220;a multipurpose community enterprise housing businesses, offices, shops, a day care, a seniors&#8217; center, an interpretive museum, and a restaurant.&#8221; Without denying the ambitiousness of the project described, I must say that I am a little disappointed. As noted in the earlier post, I&#8217;m interested in new uses that really take advantage of the elevator architecture functionally. Other than the possibility of having the restaurant at the top, there doesn&#8217;t seem to be much of that here.</p>
<p>Of course, now that I&#8217;ve thought about the climbing facility idea more I&#8217;m beginning to wonder if it&#8217;s as structurally feasible as I thought. If I wasn&#8217;t so allergic to grain dust I&#8217;d probably try and get a tour inside an elevator to find out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ditto.ca/weblog/2004/09/more-elevator-adaption-notes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Idea for a Grain Elevator Adaptation</title>
		<link>http://ditto.ca/weblog/2004/08/idea-for-a-grain-elevator-adaptation/</link>
		<comments>http://ditto.ca/weblog/2004/08/idea-for-a-grain-elevator-adaptation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2004 02:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[the proprietor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary Unbound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grain elevator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manitoba]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ditto.ca/weblog/?p=6</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Elevators are great buildings. They look cool, but they also have this huge tall space inside. Unfortunately, with changes in agriculture, they aren&#8217;t as useful as grain storage facilities as they once were. A lot of people are always talking about alternative uses for them, because it&#8217;s such a shame when structurally sound elevators are [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elevators are great buildings. They look cool, but they also have this huge tall space inside. Unfortunately, with changes in agriculture, they aren&#8217;t as useful as grain storage facilities as they once were. A lot of people are always talking about alternative uses for them, because it&#8217;s such a shame when structurally sound elevators are torn down.</p>
<p>The ideas that I&#8217;ve heard include turning them into museums or putting a restaurants up top. The museum one is obvious, and it has happened (at least in <a href="http://www.ingliselevators.com/" title="Inglis Elevators National Historic Site">Inglis</a>). I don&#8217;t know if any of the restaurant proposals have actually happened.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s one idea that&#8217;s been clunking around in my head for a while, but I&#8217;ve not yet seen it mentioned anywhere else. I think an elevator would make a great rock climbing facility. A lot of climbing walls are put into normal sized buildings, which means they aren&#8217;t very tall or explorable like a real rock face would be. But, an elevator would allow the creation of some truly awesome walls both inside and out.</p>
<p>The really interesting part is that on the inside, in addition to being all-season and all-weather, it might be possible to make the walls easily movable. Most of the climbing walls I&#8217;ve seen (an admittedly small quantity) are static except for the movable holds, but I think it would be cool if you could also move the wall portions. I think the structure of an elevator lends itself to that kind of reconfiguration because there are so many different ways to build supports.</p>
<p>(Note to self: Google this.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ditto.ca/weblog/2004/08/idea-for-a-grain-elevator-adaptation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
